SCHIP, a damed exasperating subject
This is a more serious rant about the SCHIP bill, HR 376, and Graeme Frost.
*Note: If you are angered by foul language, you'll be even more angered by this. but i cuss a bit. its a strong subject. I've been told this rant is biased. Oh well, I have an opinion about it (no duh).
and anyone who can tell me what I'm referencing in the title receives 10000 David dollars.*
10 yrs. ago, Congress made a bill called the S-CHIP: State Children’s Health Insurance Program. This gave health insurance to underage citizens with parents who don't receive health care from their jobs, earn 2 much money for real medicaid, but still way below the poverty line. Its not the best, not the highest priority 4 doctors, but if a 12yr.old cracks his head open in a car crash, he has a chance of living w/o his family having to pay thousands of dollars. YAY America helping its youngins not die.This bill was up 4 renewal earlier this year. Congress looked at stats and noticed over 60% of kids below the poverty line still didn't receive health care. They decided to add an extra part called HR 976 which would expand it by 7x as much federal funding. Bush vetoed it. He decided giving health care to children and putting the GOP in a better lite didn't matter. He consistently gives 2 reasons: 1) socialized health care is anti-American and 2) giving these kids health care would take people away from privatized insurance companies. Other conservatives say they don't want their tax dollars to go to poor kids. There's a war going on! Ignore the future leaders of America, lets take over Iraq! OK enough sarcasm. Then there's Graeme Frost. ill get to him later. I'm gonna try dissecting this argument.
its true, part of (dirty) capitalism is the gov doesn't keep people from dying of TB or strep or flu or MRSA or staph or etc., its the individuals responsibility. but THIS IS CHILDREN!!! kids get fevers and r bedridden and can even die b/c of this! now shouldn't the gov care? we have to take care of our future, all of em, mind u. its not their fault they cant pay their medical bills. so y do they get punished? they can receive lower schooling from the gov if they cant afford better b/c they cant provide 4 themselves. they cant get jobs! they cant receive it from anyone but their parents, and if their parents cant, they're stuck. game over. if they get MRSA, who cares, they're poor. the gov needs to intervene evry so often b/c these r innocent children who simply depend on this bill to LIVE! THEY DIE SIMPLY B/C WE'RE 2 STUBBORN! WTF!?!?!?
This paragraph is more brief. these r kids who r impoverished. w/ parents who struggle to put food on the table nightly. so how can they get privatized health care in the 1st place? their jobs, if they even exist, r most likely the kind of jobs that don't provide health care, esp for their kids. SO HOW THE FUCK DOES GIVING THESE UNFORTUNATE KIDS MEDICARE TAKE AWAY FROM PRIVATE CARE!!?!?!?!?
the epitome of the third argument is given in a quote from Michelle Malkin's blog: "One has to wonder that if time and money can be found to remodel a home, send kids to exclusive private schools, purchase commercial property and run your own business... maybe money can be found for other things, maybe Dad should drop his woodworking hobby and get a real job that offers health insurance rather than making people like me (also with 4 kids in a 600sf smaller house and tuition $16,000 less per kid and no commercial property ownership) pay for it in my taxes. there r logical explanations 4 all of them. if your 3yr.old next door neighbor got shot, wouldn't u call 911? wouldn't u want them to be helped? think of them bawling their eyes out. not a pretty pic. now y is that kid mor special than a 12-year-rold in Chimemboscowangelesvilletownimore? and what should the tax dollars go to? killing people in Iraq? tax cuts? now many people "rather dislike" taxes, but health care needs to be a priority 2.
So this leads me to the newest complication of SCHIP: Graeme Frost. that's who malkin is referring 2. i sympathize w/ the kid. I'm very not rich, but i live in a house in a really expensive neighborhood w/ unusually good schools and get health care from my dads work (the government coincidentally). conservatives r jumping down the throat of a scared 12yr.old boy who got in a car accident and received help from the gov. he would've died w/o SCHIP. he just was trying to return the favor. now people like Malkin are saying"i give income tax to cure a little brat who wants my pity doesn't die in a painful fashion! inconceivable!". he goes to park in Baltimore. hes a real person who doesn't want kids to die like he did. now is that so awful.
so in conclusion, what the fuck bush? y do u hate everyone? will u ever stop being paranoid/stupid for 5 seconds and look at the country? and what's the worst that can happen if HR 376 was passed? greedy people exploit it like people already do w/ all government programs? oh well. kids will die. they don't matter. they're not the future. they're not Oprah. they're poor. now isn't that ridiculous?
if i got any of this wrong, let me know. have a good weekend while little kids die.
LET ME JUST SAY THAT I AGREE WITH ALL OF THIS.
Thanks for devoting time to read this.
2 comments:
Hey, I know what the title references... and yeah, thats me ranting. On a side note, this was inspired by the treatment of Graeme Frost more than anything. Yes, I believe S-CHIP is good and HR 376 should have been passed, but there are valid reasons for both of them. The treatment of Graeme Frost though is truly unacceptable. This 12 yr old wanted kids to have health care. And people like Malkin attack him from all angles. Truly unacceptable.
i meant there are valid reasons against both of them, not "there are valid reasons for both of them"
Post a Comment